<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to find early adopters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/</link>
	<description>High-Tech Marketing and Customer Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Customer and Product development as a means to product/market fit. &#124; Liad Shababo</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>Customer and Product development as a means to product/market fit. &#124; Liad Shababo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 07:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=483#comment-462</guid>
		<description>[...] you dont have time to read everything, make sure you check out his post on how to find early adopters and his thoughts on product and customer development being complimentary iteration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you dont have time to read everything, make sure you check out his post on how to find early adopters and his thoughts on product and customer development being complimentary iteration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; FAQ: Customer Development for Product Managers The Experience is the Product &#124; Better product management and products</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; FAQ: Customer Development for Product Managers The Experience is the Product &#124; Better product management and products</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=483#comment-416</guid>
		<description>[...] How to Find Early Adopters by Brant Cooper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to Find Early Adopters by Brant Cooper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Murphy</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=483#comment-44</guid>
		<description>I think you have to find people who are in a lot of pain and need to take action because they want to get off the path that they are on. This makes them assess the risks associated with your product, while still considerable, as more tolerable than the status quo. I look for individuals or firms for whom the status quo is at least unsatisfactory if not a near death experience.

Some examples: there may be consider able innovation in both the automobile and newspaper industries in the next decade because the current situation is so precarious. Atul Gawande in &quot;Better&quot; recounts considerable innovation in the &quot;medical service supply chain&quot; for combat troops during the second Iraq War. In this case they were able to make changes in war because the casualties would have died otherwise, there was little downside risk.

Another impetus for change is when an industry is similar and adjacent to another that has already made a transition. Many aspects of medical care, for example, involve the need to manage paperwork intelligently (e..g electronic medical record) but really require no more care than Amazon lavishes on making sure that your books arrive.

I like your suggestion to interview prospects and to focus on what they will pay for. I think there is some advantage to talking to more conservative prospects  (mainstream or laggard) as a fraction of your total interview pool. One of the downsides of early adopters is that they often are able to avoid or work around shortcomings in your offering, frequently without telling you. I think you need to continue to talk to some mainstream prospects to continue to make your pitch more easily intelligible.

Great topic, interesting seeing you write more on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to find people who are in a lot of pain and need to take action because they want to get off the path that they are on. This makes them assess the risks associated with your product, while still considerable, as more tolerable than the status quo. I look for individuals or firms for whom the status quo is at least unsatisfactory if not a near death experience.</p>
<p>Some examples: there may be consider able innovation in both the automobile and newspaper industries in the next decade because the current situation is so precarious. Atul Gawande in &#8220;Better&#8221; recounts considerable innovation in the &#8220;medical service supply chain&#8221; for combat troops during the second Iraq War. In this case they were able to make changes in war because the casualties would have died otherwise, there was little downside risk.</p>
<p>Another impetus for change is when an industry is similar and adjacent to another that has already made a transition. Many aspects of medical care, for example, involve the need to manage paperwork intelligently (e..g electronic medical record) but really require no more care than Amazon lavishes on making sure that your books arrive.</p>
<p>I like your suggestion to interview prospects and to focus on what they will pay for. I think there is some advantage to talking to more conservative prospects  (mainstream or laggard) as a fraction of your total interview pool. One of the downsides of early adopters is that they often are able to avoid or work around shortcomings in your offering, frequently without telling you. I think you need to continue to talk to some mainstream prospects to continue to make your pitch more easily intelligible.</p>
<p>Great topic, interesting seeing you write more on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Allred</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/06/how-to-find-early-adopters/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=483#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this Brant. I&#039;ve gotten a lot out of Steve Blank&#039;s book, but it&#039;s also nice to see customer development articulated in another way. Looking forward to more like this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this Brant. I&#8217;ve gotten a lot out of Steve Blank&#8217;s book, but it&#8217;s also nice to see customer development articulated in another way. Looking forward to more like this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
