<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Customer Development Gut Checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/</link>
	<description>High-Tech Marketing and Customer Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:39:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Defining early adopters &#124; Liad Shababo</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Defining early adopters &#124; Liad Shababo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 11:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-463</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember pain in and of itself does not guarantee action. Action is predicated on  pain &gt; ($ of product + $implementation + risk of change) * status quo coefficient. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember pain in and of itself does not guarantee action. Action is predicated on  pain &gt; ($ of product + $implementation + risk of change) * status quo coefficient. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to avoid being blinded by the idea aura &#171; T-Mobile Dose</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>How to avoid being blinded by the idea aura &#171; T-Mobile Dose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-197</guid>
		<description>[...] if your product emerges from the media miasma, you still have to conquer the “status quo coefficient,” – inertia caused by unknown customer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if your product emerges from the media miasma, you still have to conquer the “status quo coefficient,” – inertia caused by unknown customer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to avoid being blinded by the idea aura &#124; qface &#38; sowmo sky</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>How to avoid being blinded by the idea aura &#124; qface &#38; sowmo sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-188</guid>
		<description>[...] if your product emerges from the media miasma, you still have to conquer the ?status quo coefficient,? – inertia caused by unknown customer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if your product emerges from the media miasma, you still have to conquer the ?status quo coefficient,? – inertia caused by unknown customer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Diego: Is Your Startup Lean? &#124; SANDIOS</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>San Diego: Is Your Startup Lean? &#124; SANDIOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] highly flexible organization, adept at adapting, may not find a market worth pursuing.  These are gut-check moments.   Ultimately, it&#8217;s better to learn quickly that an idea&#8217;s time has not (yet) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] highly flexible organization, adept at adapting, may not find a market worth pursuing.  These are gut-check moments.   Ultimately, it&#8217;s better to learn quickly that an idea&#8217;s time has not (yet) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fail fast, but fail smart &#171; Market By Numbers - Brant Cooper</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Fail fast, but fail smart &#171; Market By Numbers - Brant Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 23:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] Compounded mistakes may lead to a business failing. I would never wish a failure of one&#8217;s business on anybody.  (Or at least on any true entrepreneur.)    Though as Steve Blank said last night @startup2startup, the main reason businesses fail is due of a lack of customers. It is true that if you&#8217;re business is going to fail, you may want it to fail fast.  (Like before it&#8217;s even started.  Hence customer development gut check #1.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Compounded mistakes may lead to a business failing. I would never wish a failure of one&#8217;s business on anybody.  (Or at least on any true entrepreneur.)    Though as Steve Blank said last night @startup2startup, the main reason businesses fail is due of a lack of customers. It is true that if you&#8217;re business is going to fail, you may want it to fail fast.  (Like before it&#8217;s even started.  Hence customer development gut check #1.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Allred</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Allred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Brant,

Enjoyed this post, thanks. Agree with you that Customer Development should be implemented as early as possible, and I suspect that it will become more and more common to see founders implementing it from day one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brant,</p>
<p>Enjoyed this post, thanks. Agree with you that Customer Development should be implemented as early as possible, and I suspect that it will become more and more common to see founders implementing it from day one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ehret</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ehret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Brant, Thanks for the response. I guess this hits to the heart of the problem with larger businesses. Resources are spent making the management team and board members comfortable. That is the foundation of compromise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brant, Thanks for the response. I guess this hits to the heart of the problem with larger businesses. Resources are spent making the management team and board members comfortable. That is the foundation of compromise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant Cooper</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Jay, thanks for the comment and generally, I agree.  Depending on the business and its resources, however, it&#039;s possible to test multiple segments during your learning phase.  One might use a 70-20-10 model, for instance, where each number represents the % of resources committed to each segment.  This servers (at least) 2 purposes.  First, it eases the anxiety of management team and board members uncomfortable with the these concepts; and second, it creates efficiencies when moving resources from a segment that&#039;s not working into one that is next in line to test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, thanks for the comment and generally, I agree.  Depending on the business and its resources, however, it&#8217;s possible to test multiple segments during your learning phase.  One might use a 70-20-10 model, for instance, where each number represents the % of resources committed to each segment.  This servers (at least) 2 purposes.  First, it eases the anxiety of management team and board members uncomfortable with the these concepts; and second, it creates efficiencies when moving resources from a segment that&#8217;s not working into one that is next in line to test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ehret</title>
		<link>http://market-by-numbers.com/2009/04/customer-development-gut-checks/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ehret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://market-by-numbers.com/?p=272#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Regarding gut check #2, I would recommend not pursuing several segments simultaneously early on. This segmentation of customers, leads to other segmentation,  namely segmenting your time and your brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding gut check #2, I would recommend not pursuing several segments simultaneously early on. This segmentation of customers, leads to other segmentation,  namely segmenting your time and your brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
